An anxiety-depressive disorder can suspend the statute of limitations on an action to contest a dismissal

Cass. soc. January 25, 2023 n° 21-17.791 F-D, Sté Lyreco France c/ J.

For the record, before the entry into force of article 2234 of the Civil Code enshrined in the law of June 17, 2008, the Social Chamber of the Court of Cassation was based on the adage ” contra non valentem agere non currit praescriptio“to consider that the employee’s state of health could characterize a case of force majeure.

Thus, the Court of Cassation approved the Court of Appeal’s homologation of the medical expertise and retained that the employee’s state of health, following an accident, had made it impossible for him to take the slightest action on his own behalf for 9 years and that he had been prevented from declaring his work-related accident to the health insurance fund within 2 years of the event, the statute of limitations having been suspended (Cass. soc. February 13, 1964 n°63-10.274 P).

Since June 19, 2008, there is therefore a textual basis providing that the statute of limitations does not run or is suspended against a person who is unable to act as a result of an impediment resulting either from the law, an agreement, or force majeure (article 2234 of the Civil Code).

The decision rendered by the Social Chamber of the highest jurisdiction on January 25 is a rare illustration of the suspension of the statute of limitations of the action to contest the dismissal for force majeure (Cass. soc. January 25, 2023 n° 21-17.791 F-D, Sté Lyreco France c/ J.).

In this case, an employee was hospitalized in July 2015, i.e., more than a year after she started working, due to burnout, according to her psychiatrist. A few weeks after returning to work, she was terminated for cause by registered letter with return receipt on November 2, 2015. On the same day, she informs her employer that she has suffered a work-related accident.

After her dismissal, the employee took steps to have the existence of a work-related accident recognized and to contest the decision by the CPAM to refuse to cover this accident. In February 2016, she wrote to the employer to, on the one hand, contest the effective date of her dismissal and, on the other hand, request her reinstatement.

Then, it was only on February 2, 2018, i.e. two years and three months after her dismissal, that she filed a complaint with the Conseil de prud’hommes challenging her dismissal.

The question then arose as to whether his action was time-barred, to which the Court of Cassation replied in the negative, rejecting the employer’s power!

To this end, the highest court noted that the employee was faced with a force majeure demonstrated by the fact that she had been hospitalized as of July 2015 with significant anxiety-depressive disorders, justified by medical certificates, which had prevented her from acting, thereby suspending the statute of limitations on the action.

This decision illustrates, once again, the fact that in matters of prescription, it does not matter what the time limit is, what is very important is to :

  • fix the starting point with precision,
  • ensure that the time frame is short.

This decision, even if it is a rare case, may nevertheless lead us to think that it is advisable to redouble our vigilance with regard to actions taken by employees who have serious psychosocial risks or who accuse their employer of having committed acts of moral harassment against them…

You may also be interested in this news
The News by NMCG – May 2023
News By NMCG
The News by NMCG - May 2023
The intuitu personae clause tested by a change of control or management of one of the contracting companies
Article
The intuitu personae clause tested by a change of control or management of one of the contracting companies
Legislative and case law developments for “Dark stores” and “Dark kitchens
Article
Legislative and case law developments for "Dark stores" and "Dark kitchens
Unfair competition: borrowing elements of a communication is protectable […]
Article
Unfair competition: borrowing elements of a communication is protectable [...]
Interpretation of approval clauses prior to the reform of June 24, 2004 […].
Article
Interpretation of approval clauses prior to the reform of June 24, 2004 [...].
Bank’s duty to warn […].
Article
Bank's duty to warn [...].
Presumption of resignation in the event of voluntary abandonment of post by employee comes into force on April 19, 2023
Article
Presumption of resignation in the event of voluntary abandonment of post by employee comes into force on April 19, 2023
New ruling by the French Supreme Court on moral harassment
Article
New ruling by the French Supreme Court on moral harassment
Employers can use anonymous testimony to prove employee misconduct
Article
Employers can use anonymous testimony to prove employee misconduct
Clarifications from the Cour de cassation on the renunciation of the DS mandate
Article
Clarifications from the Cour de cassation on the renunciation of the DS mandate
Lawyer profile : Claire Peroux
Inside NMCG
Lawyer profile : Claire Peroux
Sub-leasing of commercial premises
Article
Sub-leasing of commercial premises
Non-compliance with the GDPR is a new ground for cancellation of a contract
Article
Non-compliance with the GDPR is a new ground for cancellation of a contract
Application of the new law to unilateral promises made before the reform of February 16, 2016
Article
Application of the new law to unilateral promises made before the reform of February 16, 2016
The acquisition of shares by the company following the refusal of approval of a transfer to a third party
Article
The acquisition of shares by the company following the refusal of approval of a transfer to a third party
Use of delegation hours and the role of the interim relief judge
Article
Use of delegation hours and the role of the interim relief judge
The Distinctions