An employee’s preliminary interview may be conducted by the authorized manager of another company in the same group.

 

In this case, an employee was made redundant after his company was acquired by a Group.

As a result, he took his case to the industrial tribunal to contest the termination and the procedure, which he claimed was irregular.

The Court of Appeal rejected his request, ruling that the dismissal procedure was in order on the grounds that the manager who conducted the preliminary interview had been sent by one of the group’s companies as an external consultant. He had also received a mandate to act in the name and on behalf of the legal representative of the acquired company in its operational, administrative and financial management.

The judges also noted that the management entrusted to the agent included human resources, which implied the conduct of disciplinary and dismissal procedures.

In response to the employee’s appeal, the legal judges pointed out that articles L.1232-3 and L.1232-6 of the French Labor Code state that the very purpose of the preliminary interview and the rules governing notification of dismissal prohibit the employer from appointing a person from outside the company to conduct the interview and notify the dismissal.

Nevertheless, the High Court dismissed the appeal and reiterated the findings of the Court of Appeal, adding that the delegate was not a stranger to the company, thereby rendering the dismissal procedure lawful.

In other words, the director of a group company sent as a consultant to one of the companies with a mandate to act in particular in human resources management cannot be considered as a foreign person and can regularly hold the preliminary interview.

This ruling consolidates the position of the Cour de cassation in this area, which had previously held that the parent company’s HR department can be mandated to carry out the preliminary interview and dismissal of an employee of one of the subsidiaries insofar as he is not considered as a person outside the company. (cass. Soc. September 23, 2009, no. 07-44200).

(Cass. soc. 28-6-2023 n° 21-18.142 FS-B, O. c/ Sté Dimonix)

You may also be interested in this news
News by NMCG – July & August 2023
News By NMCG
News by NMCG - July & August 2023
The mobility clause: no infringement of the employee’s fundamental right to personal and family life
Article
The mobility clause: no infringement of the employee's fundamental right to personal and family life
Employees may not be heard as part of an expert appraisal commissioned by the CSE without the employer’s express agreement.
Article
Employees may not be heard as part of an expert appraisal commissioned by the CSE without the employer's express agreement.
NMCG Avocats assists the Valmen Group in its acquisition of Vivei
Press release
NMCG Avocats assists the Valmen Group in its acquisition of Vivei
NMCG Avocats proudly celebrates its 15th anniversary!
Inside NMCG
NMCG Avocats proudly celebrates its 15th anniversary!
Lawyer profile: Arnaud Blanc de la Naulte
Inside NMCG
Lawyer profile: Arnaud Blanc de la Naulte
How should alcohol advertising be regulated?
Article
How should alcohol advertising be regulated?
Substitution clauses in promises to sell are unenforceable […].
Article
Substitution clauses in promises to sell are unenforceable [...].
Mass poaching of a competitor’s staff constitutes an act of unfair competition […].
Article
Mass poaching of a competitor's staff constitutes an act of unfair competition [...].
The value-sharing bill
Article
The value-sharing bill
The journey from the hotel to the employee’s place of work does not constitute actual working time.
Article
The journey from the hotel to the employee's place of work does not constitute actual working time.
The presumption of resignation for abandonment of post has not finished making headlines
Article
The presumption of resignation for abandonment of post has not finished making headlines
Nullity of dismissal: reinstatement possible for an employee who abandons his request for judicial termination
Article
Nullity of dismissal: reinstatement possible for an employee who abandons his request for judicial termination
The criminal conviction of an employee who has disturbed the smooth running of the company […].
Article
The criminal conviction of an employee who has disturbed the smooth running of the company [...].
News by NMCG – June 2023
News By NMCG
News by NMCG - June 2023
An employee declared unfit for work may be dismissed for misconduct if he or she hinders redeployment.
Article
An employee declared unfit for work may be dismissed for misconduct if he or she hinders redeployment.
The Distinctions