Only bad faith allows an employee to be dismissed […]

Cass. Soc. February 15, 2023, n°21-20811

The insulting nature of a denunciation of moral harassment does not constitute a fault and cannot characterize a reason for dismissal.

In this case, a senior manager had sent a confidential email to the General Manager, his direct n+1, in which he pointed out the behavior of the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), about which some members of the head office had complained.

The terms of this letter were direct, and for some insulting, even defamatory: the CFO was presented as “pedantic,” “obnoxious,” or even “harmful,” “incapable of answering a simple question, even when it comes to finance. It was specified that he was “hated and dangerous: hated because he is hateful and dangerous because he is incompetent”.

This freedom of tone was reproached, to the point of being the subject of a dismissal procedure for serious misconduct, motivated by the use of abusive, defamatory or excessive language against a member of the management. We note in passing the risk taken by the employer who targets, in his notification letter, the offences of defamation and insult, but that is not the problem.

Indeed, the employee applied to the courts to have his dismissal annulled, which is known to be a particularly severe form of compensation for the employer, arguing that his dismissal had been pronounced in a context of denunciation of acts of moral harassment.

The judges ruled in his favor.

  • The protection of the employee who denounces facts that he qualifies as moral harassment

Article L 1152-1 of the French Labor Code provides that no employee may be subjected to repeated acts of moral harassment that have the purpose or effect of degrading working conditions likely to infringe on his or her rights and dignity, to alter his or her physical or mental health or to compromise his or her professional future.

It follows from this principle that the employer is prohibited from dismissing the employee for having denounced harassment, unless he runs the risk of having the dismissal annulled by a Labour Court. (Articles L1152-2 and -3 of the Labour Code)

As a reminder, when a dismissal is declared null and void, the compensatory consequences can be very significant. Thus, for example, when no reinstatement is requested, the “Macron” scale is disregarded, so that there is no legal ceiling to the prud’homale sentences, which can therefore be very high, if the circumstances justify it.

  • In such a case, the loophole in this protection is strictly limited to the hypothesis of bad faith

Naturally, this solid protection has a limit, of common sense: bad faith (Cass. Soc., June 10, 2015, n°13-25554, P -BC). However, the definition of bad faith is very precise: it is characterized when it is established that the employee had knowledge of the falsity of the facts denounced.

This bad faith could therefore not be characterized by the violence of the denunciations, or their injurious character (when they contain or reveal a value judgment).

Therefore, the employee’s message had to be considered as an alert to his superior, the purpose of which was to reveal the situation to him, and therefore to allow him to take all appropriate measures.

The dismissal was therefore null and void, regardless of the terms used by the employee in his denunciation.

It should be noted, however, that outside of this hypothesis, an employee’s abuse of freedom of expression, resulting from insulting, defamatory or excessive comments, may justify, depending on the circumstances, a dismissal for serious misconduct (Cass. Soc. October 7, 1997, n°93-41747, P -BC).

Given the importance of the legal and compensation consequences, it is crucial to distinguish between these two configurations.

And in any case, to avoid, in one way or another, dismissing an employee for his or her statements, as freedom of expression is now constantly being brandished and seized upon by the labour courts in order to cancel the dismissal.

You may also be interested in this news
The News by NMCG – May 2023
News By NMCG
The News by NMCG - May 2023
The intuitu personae clause tested by a change of control or management of one of the contracting companies
Article
The intuitu personae clause tested by a change of control or management of one of the contracting companies
Legislative and case law developments for “Dark stores” and “Dark kitchens
Article
Legislative and case law developments for "Dark stores" and "Dark kitchens
Unfair competition: borrowing elements of a communication is protectable […]
Article
Unfair competition: borrowing elements of a communication is protectable [...]
Interpretation of approval clauses prior to the reform of June 24, 2004 […].
Article
Interpretation of approval clauses prior to the reform of June 24, 2004 [...].
Bank’s duty to warn […].
Article
Bank's duty to warn [...].
Presumption of resignation in the event of voluntary abandonment of post by employee comes into force on April 19, 2023
Article
Presumption of resignation in the event of voluntary abandonment of post by employee comes into force on April 19, 2023
New ruling by the French Supreme Court on moral harassment
Article
New ruling by the French Supreme Court on moral harassment
Employers can use anonymous testimony to prove employee misconduct
Article
Employers can use anonymous testimony to prove employee misconduct
Clarifications from the Cour de cassation on the renunciation of the DS mandate
Article
Clarifications from the Cour de cassation on the renunciation of the DS mandate
Lawyer profile : Claire Peroux
Inside NMCG
Lawyer profile : Claire Peroux
Sub-leasing of commercial premises
Article
Sub-leasing of commercial premises
Non-compliance with the GDPR is a new ground for cancellation of a contract
Article
Non-compliance with the GDPR is a new ground for cancellation of a contract
Application of the new law to unilateral promises made before the reform of February 16, 2016
Article
Application of the new law to unilateral promises made before the reform of February 16, 2016
The acquisition of shares by the company following the refusal of approval of a transfer to a third party
Article
The acquisition of shares by the company following the refusal of approval of a transfer to a third party
An anxiety-depressive disorder can suspend the statute of limitations on an action to contest a dismissal
Article
An anxiety-depressive disorder can suspend the statute of limitations on an action to contest a dismissal
The Distinctions