The acquisition of shares by the company following the refusal of approval of a transfer to a third party

Cass, Com, January 4, 2023, n°21-10.035

In its decision of January 4, 2023, the Court of Cassation affirms that a company which refuses to approve the transfer of a partner’s shares to a third party, and which requests the sequestration of the shares as well as the appointment of an expert to determine their value, is obliged to repurchase these shares.

 

1. The legal framework

Article 1843-4 provides that in the event of the transfer of a partner’s corporate rights or the repurchase of such rights by the company – without their value being determined or determinable – the value may be determined by an expert in the event of disagreement between the parties.

 

 

2. The facts

The articles of association of a simplified joint stock company (SAS) stipulated that in case of refusal of approval, the company had to, within a period of two months from the notification of the decision of refusal, either have the shares repurchased by one or several partners, or proceed to this repurchase itself. The redemption price was then to be fixed by mutual agreement, and failing that, under the conditions provided for in Article 1843 of the Civil Code.

Furthermore, if the redemption was not completed within two months, the approval was considered to be given.

In this case, the company refused the approval of a transfer of shares from a partner to a third party, and requested the sequestration of the shares held by the partner, as well as the evaluation of their value by an expert, on the basis of article 1843-4 of the Civil Code.

The partner then asked the company to pay him the transfer price determined by the expert. The company refused his request, arguing that if the shares were not redeemed within the two-month period, the transfer was presumed to be approved.

The partner then summoned the company in order to obtain the lifting of the sequestration and the payment of the transfer price of his shares.

The Court of Appeal of Papeete rejected his request in a decision of October 8, 2020, on the grounds that in the absence of an agreement between the partner and the company on the purchase price, or at least on the principle of an appraisal, only the approval of the initial project was considered as given.

 

3. The opinion of the Court of Cassation

The Court of Cassation overturned the appeal decision, determining that by requesting the sequestration of the partner’s shares and the appointment of an expert to determine their value, the company had manifested its intention to acquire the shares at the price set by the expert, so that an agreement had been reached on the matter and on the methods for determining the price.

Indeed, the issue of the offer was deduced from the sequestration of the shares, which constitutes an offer on the thing, and from the request for the appointment of an expert, which constitutes an offer on the methods of determining the price. The consent of the parties is then tacit.

The company cannot therefore retract its decision by invoking a tacit approval due to the non-repurchase of the shares within the statutory time limits.

You may also be interested in this news
The News by NMCG – May 2023
News By NMCG
The News by NMCG - May 2023
The intuitu personae clause tested by a change of control or management of one of the contracting companies
Article
The intuitu personae clause tested by a change of control or management of one of the contracting companies
Legislative and case law developments for “Dark stores” and “Dark kitchens
Article
Legislative and case law developments for "Dark stores" and "Dark kitchens
Unfair competition: borrowing elements of a communication is protectable […]
Article
Unfair competition: borrowing elements of a communication is protectable [...]
Interpretation of approval clauses prior to the reform of June 24, 2004 […].
Article
Interpretation of approval clauses prior to the reform of June 24, 2004 [...].
Bank’s duty to warn […].
Article
Bank's duty to warn [...].
Presumption of resignation in the event of voluntary abandonment of post by employee comes into force on April 19, 2023
Article
Presumption of resignation in the event of voluntary abandonment of post by employee comes into force on April 19, 2023
New ruling by the French Supreme Court on moral harassment
Article
New ruling by the French Supreme Court on moral harassment
Employers can use anonymous testimony to prove employee misconduct
Article
Employers can use anonymous testimony to prove employee misconduct
Clarifications from the Cour de cassation on the renunciation of the DS mandate
Article
Clarifications from the Cour de cassation on the renunciation of the DS mandate
Lawyer profile : Claire Peroux
Inside NMCG
Lawyer profile : Claire Peroux
Sub-leasing of commercial premises
Article
Sub-leasing of commercial premises
Non-compliance with the GDPR is a new ground for cancellation of a contract
Article
Non-compliance with the GDPR is a new ground for cancellation of a contract
Application of the new law to unilateral promises made before the reform of February 16, 2016
Article
Application of the new law to unilateral promises made before the reform of February 16, 2016
An anxiety-depressive disorder can suspend the statute of limitations on an action to contest a dismissal
Article
An anxiety-depressive disorder can suspend the statute of limitations on an action to contest a dismissal
Use of delegation hours and the role of the interim relief judge
Article
Use of delegation hours and the role of the interim relief judge
The Distinctions