Dismissal for misconduct and criminal conviction: criminal evidence cannot be challenged before the industrial tribunal

Cass. Soc. 21 September 2022 n° 20-16.841

As a reminder, it is settled case law that the employer cannot rely on video recordings collected without the employees’ knowledge before the civil courts. However, res judicata in criminal cases would allow an exception to this rule.

In this case, an employee was filmed without his knowledge during an altercation. Based on the video recording, the employer dismisses him for gross misconduct.
Considering that his dismissal lacked real and serious grounds, the employee brought an action before the labour court.
The criminal judge convicted him of intentional violence, holding that the method of proof was lawful.
Noting that the dismissal was based on facts for which the employee had been criminally convicted, the Court of Appeal stated that it was based on real and serious grounds.
The employee claims that the method of proof on which his dismissal is based is unfair and unlawful. As such, it is inadmissible before the civil court, regardless of the assessment made by the criminal court.
He lodged an appeal in cassation.

Can a method of proof deemed conclusive by the criminal court be challenged before the industrial tribunal?

The Court of Cassation answers in the negative. The employee cannot challenge, before the labour court, the legality of a method of proof deemed probative by the criminal court. The authority of res judicata on the merits of the case in the criminal courts is binding in the civil courts. This authority extends to the reasons that are the necessary support for the head of the body issuing the decision.
While the principle of res judicata in criminal cases is continually accepted in civil cases (Civ., 7 March 1855, Bull. civ., no 31; Cass. 1st civ., 24 Oct. 2012, no 11-20.442; Cass. 2nd civ., 26 Oct. 2017, no 16-17.931) The solution thus adopted is no less novel in that it applies it to a method of proof that has been the subject of controversy in labour law with regard to dismissal.

This decision is therefore very interesting for employers since, if the facts are classified as criminal, they could then use, in the context of a dismissal, a video that is usually disregarded in employment law and that proves the fault committed once the criminal court has convicted on this basis.

The risk remains, however, that since the dismissal usually occurs at the time the complaint is filed, it will be impossible to ascertain, in advance, a future criminal conviction.

You may also be interested in this news
L’Actu By NMCG – February 2024
News By NMCG
L'Actu By NMCG - February 2024
No dismissal for a reason not listed in the collective agreement!
Article
No dismissal for a reason not listed in the collective agreement!
The Badinter law and a tramway’s dedicated lane
Article
The Badinter law and a tramway's dedicated lane
EGALIM 3: An obligation to negotiate in good faith […]
Article
EGALIM 3: An obligation to negotiate in good faith [...]
Paris 2024 – Governance, doping, violence, corruption, etc.: major works for an exemplary sport?
Article
Paris 2024 - Governance, doping, violence, corruption, etc.: major works for an exemplary sport?
Zero interest loan
Article
Zero interest loan
The brand and the second hand – the Chanel affair
Article
The brand and the second hand - the Chanel affair
Research tax credit (“CIR”) receivable
Article
Research tax credit ("CIR") receivable
Partial demerger – What are the advantages?
Article
Partial demerger - What are the advantages?
Automatic prejudice: the return!
Article
Automatic prejudice: the return!
Paid leave and sickness – Article L. 3141-5 5° of the French Labor Code declared compliant with the Constitution
Article
Paid leave and sickness - Article L. 3141-5 5° of the French Labor Code declared compliant with the Constitution
Termination of contract and notice period – clarifications from the Cour de cassation
Article
Termination of contract and notice period - clarifications from the Cour de cassation
PSE: the Conseil d’Etat fires a warning shot
Article
PSE: the Conseil d'Etat fires a warning shot
Employee safety – For the Cour de cassation, the employer remains liable even when he entrusts his safety to a third party
Article
Employee safety - For the Cour de cassation, the employer remains liable even when he entrusts his safety to a third party
The risk incurred by employers who neglect to monitor the working hours of their fixed-term employees
Article
The risk incurred by employers who neglect to monitor the working hours of their fixed-term employees
Lawyer profile: Vaea Pery
Inside NMCG
Lawyer profile: Vaea Pery
The Distinctions