Disciplinary dismissal: a strict one-month deadline for giving notice of termination

Cass. Soc. 28-09-2022 n° 21-15.136 F-D, U. c/ Sté Novatec Guadeloupe

 

In a decision of 28 September 2022, the Court of Cassation specifies that notification of dismissal on disciplinary grounds must take place within one month of the preliminary interview, even if the employee did not attend, failing which the dismissal is devoid of real and serious grounds.

In this case, an employee who was summoned to a preliminary interview on 21 November did not show up on the day indicated.

A new interview was scheduled by the employer on 14 December, and she was notified of her dismissal on 22 December.

Challenging the validity of her dismissal, she brought various claims before the labour court, which were ultimately dismissed.

An appeal is lodged.

The employee claims that the notification of her dismissal on 22 December was late. In this respect, it would be devoid of real and serious cause.

It states that the notification must be made within one month from the date of the first missed prior interview. It is irrelevant whether the employer has decided to postpone it to a later date on his own initiative.

This is not the opinion of the Court of Appeal, which considers that the said period begins to run the day after the date of the first interview, i.e. 22 November, and expires at midnight on 22 December.

An appeal is lodged.

Does the legal time limit for notification of dismissal on disciplinary grounds run from the day of the preliminary interview?

According to the Court of Cassation, the time limit for notification of dismissal on disciplinary grounds does indeed run from the date of the preliminary interview, and not the following day, and “expires on the day of the following month bearing the same date as the day of the preliminary interview for dismissal”. In this case, this time limit expired on 21 December at midnight, so that the notification made on 22 December was late, depriving the dismissal of real and serious grounds.

As a reminder, this rule must be respected, even when the employee regularly summoned to the interview is absent (Cass. Soc. 6 January 1999 No. 96-44.064; Cass. Soc. 14 September 2044 No. 03-43.796). And even if the employer decides, on his own initiative, to postpone the interview (Cass. Soc. 20 May 2014 n°12-28.046; Cass. Soc. 17 April 2019 n°17-31.228).

Only if the employee is unable to attend the interview or if he/she requests a postponement can the notification period be shifted by one month to the new interview date (Cass. Soc. 7 June 2006 n°004-43.819).

This is a strict position, which can only encourage people not to postpone a preliminary interview on their own initiative, unless they have a good grasp of all the deadlines.

 

 

 

You may also be interested in this news
News by NMCG – July & August 2023
News By NMCG
News by NMCG - July & August 2023
The mobility clause: no infringement of the employee’s fundamental right to personal and family life
Article
The mobility clause: no infringement of the employee's fundamental right to personal and family life
The collective agreement mentioned in the employment contract […].
Article
The collective agreement mentioned in the employment contract [...].
Employees may not be heard as part of an expert appraisal commissioned by the CSE without the employer’s express agreement.
Article
Employees may not be heard as part of an expert appraisal commissioned by the CSE without the employer's express agreement.
An employee’s preliminary interview may be conducted by the authorized manager of another company in the same group.
Article
An employee's preliminary interview may be conducted by the authorized manager of another company in the same group.
NMCG Avocats assists the Valmen Group in its acquisition of Vivei
Press release
NMCG Avocats assists the Valmen Group in its acquisition of Vivei
Lawyer profile: Arnaud Blanc de la Naulte
Inside NMCG
Lawyer profile: Arnaud Blanc de la Naulte
How should alcohol advertising be regulated?
Article
How should alcohol advertising be regulated?
Substitution clauses in promises to sell are unenforceable […].
Article
Substitution clauses in promises to sell are unenforceable [...].
Mass poaching of a competitor’s staff constitutes an act of unfair competition […].
Article
Mass poaching of a competitor's staff constitutes an act of unfair competition [...].
The value-sharing bill
Article
The value-sharing bill
The journey from the hotel to the employee’s place of work does not constitute actual working time.
Article
The journey from the hotel to the employee's place of work does not constitute actual working time.
The presumption of resignation for abandonment of post has not finished making headlines
Article
The presumption of resignation for abandonment of post has not finished making headlines
Nullity of dismissal: reinstatement possible for an employee who abandons his request for judicial termination
Article
Nullity of dismissal: reinstatement possible for an employee who abandons his request for judicial termination
The criminal conviction of an employee who has disturbed the smooth running of the company […].
Article
The criminal conviction of an employee who has disturbed the smooth running of the company [...].
News by NMCG – June 2023
News By NMCG
News by NMCG - June 2023
The Distinctions