Drink or climb, you have to choose!

Is the termination of an employee’s employment contract justified if the letter of dismissal accused him of having worked with a “higher than normal blood alcohol level“, when in fact he was “intoxicated“?

In the facts, a worker was victim of a work accident while he was on a construction site, in that he fell from a truck’s bucket on which he had been stationed to carry out his missions.

A blood alcohol test was then carried out by the gendarmerie, and proved to be positive.

In the letter notifying the dismissal, he was accused of having performed work at height “with a blood alcohol level higher than normal“.

Dismissed for gross misconduct on August 3, 2017, the interested party brought an action before the industrial tribunal to contest the termination.

However, the Court of Appeal found that the complaint was well-founded, on the grounds that the company had provided evidence that the employee was working at heights in a “state of intoxication“, which was contrary to the “rules prescribed by the internal regulations“.

However, the Court of Cassation censured the decision, recalling the strict nature of the rule that the letter of dismissal must set the limits of the dispute: “the complaint of performing work at height while intoxicated, a fact not covered by the letter of dismissal and whereas this document only referred to the facts of performing work at height with a blood alcohol level above normal.

In short, the employer must be specific about the alleged grievance in order to claim a violation of the internal regulations.

While such jurisprudence calls for caution, it is nevertheless dismayingbecause the difference between a “blood alcohol level above normal”. and a “state of drunkenness” is a matter of semantics, in addition to the fact that the result remains the same: the employee being under the influence of alcohol, he has placed himself in violation of the rules imposed on him, justifying that a sanction be pronounced against him.

But with this new absurd decision, the Court of Cassation sends a clear message: act according to your wishes, even if it means putting your life in danger, we will always be there to compensate you.

 

Cass. soc., 8 March 2023, 21-25.678

You may also be interested in this news
The News by NMCG – May 2023
News By NMCG
The News by NMCG - May 2023
The intuitu personae clause tested by a change of control or management of one of the contracting companies
Article
The intuitu personae clause tested by a change of control or management of one of the contracting companies
Legislative and case law developments for “Dark stores” and “Dark kitchens
Article
Legislative and case law developments for "Dark stores" and "Dark kitchens
Unfair competition: borrowing elements of a communication is protectable […]
Article
Unfair competition: borrowing elements of a communication is protectable [...]
Interpretation of approval clauses prior to the reform of June 24, 2004 […].
Article
Interpretation of approval clauses prior to the reform of June 24, 2004 [...].
Bank’s duty to warn […].
Article
Bank's duty to warn [...].
Presumption of resignation in the event of voluntary abandonment of post by employee comes into force on April 19, 2023
Article
Presumption of resignation in the event of voluntary abandonment of post by employee comes into force on April 19, 2023
New ruling by the French Supreme Court on moral harassment
Article
New ruling by the French Supreme Court on moral harassment
Employers can use anonymous testimony to prove employee misconduct
Article
Employers can use anonymous testimony to prove employee misconduct
Clarifications from the Cour de cassation on the renunciation of the DS mandate
Article
Clarifications from the Cour de cassation on the renunciation of the DS mandate
Lawyer profile : Claire Peroux
Inside NMCG
Lawyer profile : Claire Peroux
Sub-leasing of commercial premises
Article
Sub-leasing of commercial premises
Non-compliance with the GDPR is a new ground for cancellation of a contract
Article
Non-compliance with the GDPR is a new ground for cancellation of a contract
Application of the new law to unilateral promises made before the reform of February 16, 2016
Article
Application of the new law to unilateral promises made before the reform of February 16, 2016
The acquisition of shares by the company following the refusal of approval of a transfer to a third party
Article
The acquisition of shares by the company following the refusal of approval of a transfer to a third party
An anxiety-depressive disorder can suspend the statute of limitations on an action to contest a dismissal
Article
An anxiety-depressive disorder can suspend the statute of limitations on an action to contest a dismissal
The Distinctions